PRC Returns Nonprofit Rates

Association TRENDS

UPDATE: Postal Regulatory Commission returns rates to US Postal Service

But there is hope: USPS can adjust the rate

03/05/2015

UPDATE: March 6 – Citing numerous errors, incomplete information, and failures to comply with the law, the Postal Regulatory Commission today returned the current CPI-cap rate case back to the Postal Service for Periodicals, Standard Mail and Package Services. Read more from the Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers here.

March 4 – Only in the past few days have nonprofits learned the true impact of the U.S. Postal Service’s Jan. 15 rate case on their publications, and the impact could be devastating. The overall postal price increase on each class of mail was capped at 1.966 percent, and, due to some calculation errors, the average increase for Periodicals Mail is now estimated to be about 1.4 percent. But look at the shocking estimated postage increases that a sampling of iconic nonprofit publications face on April 26:

• Consumer Reports On Health – 16.16 percent
• Consumer Reports Money Advisor – 14.30 percent
• Ranger Rick – 9.98 percent
• Ranger Rick Jr. – 9.98 percent
• Guideposts – 9.23 percent
• Consumer Reports – 8.5 percent
• National Wildlife – 6.62 percent
• Angels on Earth – 6.12 percent
• Consumer Reports Shop Smart – 3.4 percent

These proposed rate increases raise many questions. How did this happen? Why did it take so long to find out? Did the Postal Service really intend to hit nonprofit publications this hard? We do not know all of the answers, but we do think there is a chance that this can be corrected. We believe much of it has to do with the extreme complexity of Periodicals pricing, which is driven by many factors, including weight, volume, zone, editorial vs. advertising content, sort level, barcoding, machinability and containerization.

In this rate case, the Postal Service proposed many new rate cells in an effort to induce publishers to prepare more of their Periodicals volume for the Postal Service’s Flat Sequencing System. The USPS believes that greater use of the FSS will make processing and delivery of flats such as magazines, catalogs and large envelopes more efficient. But estimating the actual rate increase for individual customers requires knowing the mail preparation rules that will accompany the new rates. The new rules will affect which of the price categories will be used under the new rates. The USPS disclosed these rule changes only recently. Hence, only very recently have nonprofit publishers learned what the impact will be. Of course, as more software is updated, estimates could change, but we are confident the overall story will be the same.

The bottom line for many nonprofits is that prices will increase much more than average if their publications are relatively light weight and have a low percentage of advertising content, relative to editorial. Particularly hard hit will be those nonprofits, such as Consumer Reports, that have a policy to not allow outside advertising at all. The impact of disproportionate increases on light weight, low-advertising publications is likely to force many of these newsletters and magazines to discontinue mailing, or reduce the frequency of their publications, and look elsewhere to achieve their very important missions.

There is hope

Is there any hope for a mid-course correction? Yes. The Postal Service still has the authority to adjust its rate proposal and we encourage USPS to use it. The Alliance has been working to educate the Postal Service regarding the impact that its proposal will have on nonprofits. We believe that the Postal Service did not intend to impose such large increases on important nonprofit publications, and that the increases are unintended collateral effects of a larger, complex pricing strategy for Periodicals. Now that it is aware of the impact on nonprofits, the Postal Service should adjust its Periodicals rate proposal to prevent the devastation of nonprofit publications and their important missions.

Details: www.nonprofitmailers.org.

© 2015 Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers. This article was originally a special report of the Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers.